U.S. health authorities came close to simply warning about a blood-clotting risk from Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine, but decided to recommend pausing use out of concern doctors would improperly treat the condition, people familiar with the matter said.
Over the previous four weeks, American health officials had become alarmed about similar blood-clotting conditions in Europe involving a Covid-19 vaccine from AstraZeneca PLC, the people said. The officials dug into a U.S. vaccine safety database and identified the cases of great concern, but debated what action to take.
By last Monday night, the officials resolved that urgent action was needed, the people said. Four of six women in the U.S. who developed the blood clots days after vaccination had initially been given heparin, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its use could have worsened the patients’ condition, the people said.
That night, the country’s top health officials agreed during a one-hour Zoom meeting to take the strongest step: publicly recommend pausing the vaccine’s use while probing the adverse-event cases, the people said.
Keep reading at Fox Business.
J&J is an actual vaccine, none of the others are. I will not have anything other than a true J&J vaccine versus the “modified DNA” Moderna or Phizer, that no one can say is risk free. This is why the rotten communists of the demoncrat party don’t want us to use a real cure, the vaccine. More have died from the moderna and phizer BS, than the SIX that died after the J&J, SIX. The hiden biden and demoncrats want death. They also want the permanent wearing of masks. I say F–K the demoncrats,
I keep reading this claim about how some vaccines are “actual” and some are “not vaccines”. Nobody ever tries to explain the difference. Maybe you can.
To help you to compose your thoughts: my understanding is that anything connected with the virus and which stimulates the body to produce antibodies is a vaccine. Are you using a different definition?
To make a valid point, you need to compare percentages, not just numbers, and you don’t even give numbers for Pfizer and Moderna.
“More” is fully compatible with “smaller percentages of deaths from these two,” given that many times more have been inoculated by these two, and earlier: I received my second Pfizer dose back on February 22, and except for a little stiffness and soreness near the inoculation site for a couple of days, there have been no ill effects.
Utter rubbish! J&J is the only one with no Nano Particles in it! The only one President Trump recommends apart from Regeneron and HCQ Gosh but these people are evil! Cures are cheap. Big Pharma dont like cheap and healthy. Ivermectin cures in a couple of days Put your faith and trust in Jesus Christ and cultivate real discernment
J&J has a lot more of the virus than the single strand of modified mRNA that Pfizer and Moderna use. And there are chemicals accompanying the “dead” virus. Do you have any information that tries to balance out the relative risks of these things?
The nano particles are designed to do two things: (1) protect the naked RNA until it is inside the cytoplasm (NOT the nucleus — it cannot penetrate the double wall of the nucleus) of the cell and (2) to enable the mRNA to gain entry into a cell.
Do not believe the scaremongering about the mRNA multiplying and spreading all through your body. Any that are not destroyed in the cell or after emerging will lack the lipid coating that gains them entry into another cell. And there are two good reasons why it cannot multiply even in the original cell that it invaded. Would you like to hear them?